From Controller to Screen: What Makes a Video Game Adaptation Worth Watching?

by Guest User

Disclosure: This is a paid guest post. The author or an affiliated third party paid for its publication, and the article may contain promotional links. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of GameTyrant or its editorial staff.

An accurate door-opening animation will get a cheer from the fans. Fine. Enjoy the reference, then let somebody through that door with something to do. I do not want to spend the next forty minutes spotting furniture. A recognizable game can buy a show a curious audience. Keeping that audience requires rather more work.

Consider the cupboard problem. A player can spend twenty minutes exploring an unimportant room and enjoy every cupboard. Put the same search on television and someone will reach for the remote. The source material has supplied a world, perhaps even a great story. The pacing has to be worked out again.

Give us somebody to follow

Arcane has a useful answer to the problem of adapting a game whose matches are not television episodes. It gives the audience people to care about before asking them to care about the wider conflict.

Netflix's account of the series identifies sisters Vi and Jinx at the center of its story, against the divisions between Piltover and Zaun. A League player brings a few extra associations to those names. Everybody else can begin with the sisters and the trouble between them, which is plenty to be getting on with.

It is a relief when a show trusts that much to be interesting. There are sisters here with a history, and that history hurts. You can follow that without knowing what either character does during a League match. The terminology can wait until you actually need it.

A fan gets another sort of pleasure from recognizing the champions. Enjoy it, provided the friend watching beside you is getting something out of the evening, too. Reaching for pause to explain the third reference in five minutes is a good sign to leave the lore discussion for afterward.

A League match can put familiar champions back on the battlefield tomorrow. A drama has to live with yesterday's decisions. I would rather see the writers explore that freedom than spend an episode demonstrating abilities that already have perfectly good animations in the game.

Fallout needs the joke to survive

Fallout's first season takes another route. Amazon introduces Lucy as an optimistic Vault dweller, with Maximus serving the Brotherhood of Steel and the Ghoul working as a bounty hunter. Already, those people have quite different ideas about getting through a day. Put them in the same wasteland and there is something to watch.

The Vault suit helps, of course. So does the power armor. But Fallout has always had a nasty sense of humor underneath its bright packaging. Take away the absurdity and you could be looking at almost any post-apocalyptic gunfight, just with more recognizable equipment.

GameTyrant's season-one review paid attention to the humor, sound and physical presentation, as well as its separate story. There is a reason to consider all of that together. A beautifully made suit of armor cannot supply comic timing. An actor still has to make the exchange around it work.

That does not give a writer permission to do absolutely anything. Change a character's motives and a fan may reasonably wonder whose story this is supposed to be. Moving an event is one thing. Leaving nobody recognizable inside the costume is another.

Bill and Frank show what television can add

The first season of HBO's The Last of Us makes a particularly interesting detour with Bill and Frank. Here is somewhere a game veteran cannot simply recite the next scene. The television story takes another course with the pair. Leave the ending unspoiled if you have yet to see it.

In PlayStation's discussion with the creators, Neil Druckmann describes Bill's focus on survival and Frank's insistence that life should contain more than that. Craig Mazin saw room to expand their story. That is a specific dramatic reason to leave the game's route, rather than changing things for the sake of surprise.

You can disagree with the result. An adaptation should be able to survive that argument. What interests me is that there is an argument to have beyond whether the furniture matches. Bill and Frank get time together that a trip through a combat section could not provide in quite the same way.

It also exposes the problem with counting reproduced scenes. In a game, surviving another fight occupies your hands as well as your attention. On television, the fourth similar encounter may just postpone the conversation you wanted to hear. Cutting it can be a mercy.

Find something for tonight

For Finnish readers browsing the entertainment section at Uutisankka.com, a familiar game name might settle tonight's choice. 

For something airing on Finnish television, TVohjelmat.com provides schedules and viewing suggestions. Use it to sort out the channel and time. Streaming instead? Open the app before making the popcorn. It is annoying to settle on a show and then discover that your subscription does not include it.

An episode is a reasonable first commitment. You do not owe it a complete season because you liked the game, or a rejection because it moved your favorite scene. By the credits, there ought to be somebody whose next decision you want to see. That is a better invitation back than another accurate door.

No author bio. End of line.

Newest GameTyrant Posts